It has become the norm for the House of Representatives to rise for a three-month summer recess, stretching from July to October.

While this is an expected occurrence in many parliamentary systems, the duration of this particular hiatus has raised eyebrows. However, the fact that it has hardly stirred a debate speak volumes about the level of accountability expected from our highest democratically-elected institution.  It is worth noting that until some years ago the summer recess would span a few weeks in August and maybe spill over to September. In the days of Dom Mintoff there would hardly be any break at all not only in summer but also during Christmas. Ironically, the lengthening of the summer break is happening while the rest of the population is struggling to juggle between work and their private life even at the peak of summer.  

This issue merits careful consideration of its implications on democracy, governance, and the public’s trust in their elected officials. On one hand, an extended parliamentary recess allows legislators time to recharge, regroup, and conduct constituency work. It can provide a much-needed respite from the relentless demands of the legislative process, allowing lawmakers to return refreshed and better equipped to tackle the nation’s challenges.

However, this lengthy recess also raises concerns about accountability and the continuity of governance.  Voters elect representatives to uphold their interests and address pressing issues. A prolonged absence from legislative duties can be perceived as a dereliction of duty, eroding the public’s trust in the political system. Furthermore, it can hinder the swift response to emerging crises or the passage of critical legislation. In this respect there have been instances which would have surely merited parliamentary attention such as the power outages experienced in July and the ongoing waste collection crisis. Yet, not even such issues merited a parliamentary debate as the House remained on holiday.

As things stand the lack of parliamentary oversight raises serious questions on government’s accountability.  

An extended parliamentary recess is not inherently detrimental to democracy and governance, provided it is used judiciously. It can serve as a valuable opportunity for legislators to connect with their constituents, engage in strategic planning, and enhance the overall functioning of the political system. However, it is imperative that this recess does not become an excuse for complacency. The responsibility to uphold the electorate’s trust and ensure effective governance remains paramount even during parliament’s hiatus.