{"id":4985,"date":"2021-08-06T18:17:18","date_gmt":"2021-08-06T16:17:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/?post_type=article&p=4985"},"modified":"2021-08-06T18:18:43","modified_gmt":"2021-08-06T16:18:43","slug":"korp-ta-etika-indipendenti-it-titjib-tat-trasparenza-u-l-integrita-fl-istituzzjonijiet-tal-ue","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/article\/korp-ta-etika-indipendenti-it-titjib-tat-trasparenza-u-l-integrita-fl-istituzzjonijiet-tal-ue\/","title":{"rendered":"Independent Ethics Body: improving transparency and integrity in EU institutions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A new EU Ethics Body will be able to initiate investigations on possible conflicts of interest or \u201crevolving door\u201d cases for Commissioners, MEPs and staff.<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a report endorsed by the Constitutional Affairs Committee MEPs set out their views on the establishment of an independent EU Ethics Body. The new EU Ethics Body would propose and advise on ethics rules for Commissioners, MEPs and staff of the participating institutions, before, during and in some cases after their term of office or employment. This new Body would also raise awareness and provide guidance on ethical matters, as well as have a compliance and advisory role with the ability to issue recommendations, including on conflicts of interest. It would work in collaboration with national authorities and other competent EU bodies and agencies, such as OLAF<\/a> and the EPPO<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would apply a uniform definition of \u2018conflict of interest\u2019, to be defined as a conflict between the public duty (i.e. professional and official accountability) and private interests, in which the public official or decision-maker has private interests that could improperly influence the performance of the activities and decisions in their responsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MEPs propose an interinstitutional agreement (IIA)<\/a> to set up the new body for the Parliament and the Commission, which would be open to all EU institutions, agencies and bodies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investigations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The EU Ethics Body should have the right to start an investigation based on information received from third parties, such as journalists, NGOs, whistle-blowers or the European Ombudsman – using anonymity where appropriate. While the duty of deciding on conflicts of interest of Commissioners-designate prior to hearings<\/a> remains a competence of the Committee on Legal Affairs<\/a>, the proposed ethics Body should be able to access administrative documents, to help the Committee decide. The Body\u2019s work would also be complementary to Parliament\u2019s right of inquiry<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Composition<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Body should comprise nine members, three each for the Commission and Parliament, and three from among former judges of the CJEU, former members of the Court of Auditors, and former EU Ombudsmen. Former MEPs and Commissioners should not make up more than a third of the membership, which would be renewed by a third every two years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before the 2019 European elections, all lead candidates for the position of European Commission President signed a pledge in favour of the establishment of an Independent Ethics Body common to all EU institutions. The Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made the same promise before her election and entrusted Vice-President V\u011bra Jourov\u00e1 with the task.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A new EU Ethics Body will be able to initiate investigations on possible conflicts of interest or \u201crevolving door\u201d cases for Commissioners, MEPs and staff. In a report endorsed by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":4986,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"issuem_issue":[231],"issuem_issue_categories":[8],"issuem_issue_tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"en","enabled_languages":["mt","en"],"languages":{"mt":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4985"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4985"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4985\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4988,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4985\/revisions\/4988"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4986"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue?post=4985"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_categories?post=4985"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_tags?post=4985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}