![\"\"](\"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/chemicals.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span>within<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>the<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>European<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Parliament<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>adopted a resolution by 65 votes to 1 and 14 abstentions, calling on the Commission to come up with a new chemicals strategy for sustainability that effectively ensures a high level of protection of health and the environment, minimising exposure to hazardous chemicals. It also says that further regulatory measures are needed to adequately protect vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant and breastfeeding\u00a0<\/span>women<\/span>\u00a0and the elderly.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The new chemicals strategy must fully reflect the precautionary principle and the polluter-pays principle, as well as being more transparent during the approval process. It should also encourage safe and sustainable alternatives to be developed in a competitive way, including through a clear commitment to securing funds for research.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n MEPs<\/span>\u00a0believe there is a need to support the \u2018one substance \u2013 one hazard assessment\u2019 principle, to allow substances to be reviewed by only one EU agency to speed up and make chemicals regulation more consistent.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n More to be done on endocrine disruptors and pesticides<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The resolution calls for a comprehensive EU framework on\u00a0<\/span>endocrine disruptors<\/span><\/a>\u00a0(EDCs) to effectively minimise the extent to which humans and the environment are exposed to EDCs, and insert specific provisions into legislation on toys, food contact materials and cosmetics to treat EDCs like substances that are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n It also calls on the Commission to heed the various\u00a0<\/span>calls of the European Parliament<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to improve the EU\u2019s authorisation procedure for pesticides and accelerate the transition towards low-risk pesticides.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Encourage green innovation and end toxic recycling<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n MEPs<\/span>\u00a0call on the Commission to develop EU criteria for Sustainable Chemicals to provide incentives for sustainable chemistry, materials and technologies, especially non-chemical alternatives that are safe.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>MEPs<\/span>\u00a0also underline that there are harmful chemicals in recycled products and therefore call for the same rules that apply to new products to apply to recycled materials.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The EU must also minimise and progressively replace animal testing through expanded use of new approach methodologies and intelligent testing strategies.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Next steps<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The resolution, which still has to be adopted by Plenary, is Parliament\u2019s input to the upcoming\u00a0<\/span>EU chemicals strategy for sustainability<\/span><\/a>\u00a0foreseen to be presented by the Commission this autumn. An\u00a0<\/span>oral question to the Commission<\/span><\/a>\u00a0has also been adopted, asking what measures the Commission is intending to take under the chemicals strategy for sustainability and in particular, how the Commission intends to improve the functioning of\u00a0<\/span>REACH<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to close the regulatory gaps in EU legislation.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00a0 The\u00a0Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0European\u00a0Parliament\u00a0adopted a resolution by 65 votes to 1 and 14 abstentions, calling on the Commission to come up with a new chemicals […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":3877,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"issuem_issue":[176],"issuem_issue_categories":[8],"issuem_issue_tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"en","enabled_languages":["mt","en"],"languages":{"mt":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3887"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3887"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3889,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3887\/revisions\/3889"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue?post=3887"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_categories?post=3887"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_tags?post=3887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}