{"id":3268,"date":"2020-01-15T12:44:35","date_gmt":"2020-01-15T11:44:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/?post_type=article&p=3268"},"modified":"2020-01-15T12:44:35","modified_gmt":"2020-01-15T11:44:35","slug":"l-etika-li-taccetta-jew-tirrifjuta-rigal-ufficjali","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/article\/l-etika-li-taccetta-jew-tirrifjuta-rigal-ufficjali\/","title":{"rendered":"The ethics of accepting or refusing an official gift"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In the last few weeks there was a discussion about the gift that the ex-Prime Minister allegedly received from\u00a0<\/span>Yorgen<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Fenech<\/span>, the person suspected of the killing of journalist Daphne\u00a0<\/span>Caruana<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Galizia<\/span>. The Office of the Prime Minister did not deny that ex-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat received a precious\u00a0<\/span>Bvlgari<\/span>\u00a0watch valued at\u00a0<\/span>\u20ac20,000<\/span>\u00a0and three bottles of wine with a value of\u00a0<\/span>\u20ac5,800<\/span>\u00a0from\u00a0<\/span>Yorgen<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Fenech<\/span>\u00a0in 2014.\u00a0 A press release<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>issued<\/span>\u00a0by the Office of the Prime Minister said that the\u00a0<\/span>ex-Prime Minister<\/span>\u00a0\u201calways abided by the code and regulations relating to the gifts he received\u201d. However, a clearer explanation from the\u00a0<\/span>ex-Prime Minister<\/span>\u00a0should have been forthcoming.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In an article related to the Code of Ethics in\u00a0<\/span>Cap 497 of the Public Administration Act<\/span>\u00a0it is stated that \u201c<\/span>No public employee or any member of his household shall accept gifts or<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>services such as might be deemed to create an obligation, real or imagined<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\u2026<\/span>\u00a0 A<\/span>\u00a0gift can be interpreted as an inducement or a reward simply because of its<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>intrinsic value and therefore only token gifts may be accepted.<\/span>\u201d<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The problem with this code of ethics is that it places the responsibility of deciding whether action needs to be taken against ministers who accept official gifts on the Prime Minister. The Code of Ethics<\/span>,<\/span>\u00a0therefore,\u00a0<\/span>does not cater for the occasion when it is the Prime Minister himself\u00a0<\/span>who<\/span>\u00a0can be compromised by such gifts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In other European states, there are guidelines<\/span>\u00a0regarding the giving and receiving of gifts. One of the challenges is where to draw the line in this area. The receiving and giving of gifts\u00a0<\/span>presents a dilemma<\/span>\u00a0for government officials\u00a0<\/span>regarding whether a gift is meant as a bribe or is just a gift.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

One does not have to be a genius to realise that members of Cabinet receive gifts. But which gifts do they keep for themselves? This famous ministerial Code of Ethics must be strengthened and must make the gifts received by government officials (and their respective value) more public and transparent. Accountability must play its role in this context to ensure that politicians are not besieged by allegations of bribery!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In the meantime,<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/i>Voice of the Workers<\/span><\/i>\u00a0welcomes the news that the Permanent Commission Against Corruption is investigating the ex-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat with regard to the gifts that he allegedly received from\u00a0<\/span>Yorgen<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Fenech<\/span>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  In the last few weeks there was a discussion about the gift that the ex-Prime Minister allegedly received from\u00a0Yorgen\u00a0Fenech, the person suspected of the killing of journalist Daphne\u00a0Caruana\u00a0Galizia. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":3269,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"issuem_issue":[148],"issuem_issue_categories":[],"issuem_issue_tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"en","enabled_languages":["mt","en"],"languages":{"mt":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3268"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3268"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3268\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3274,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/3268\/revisions\/3274"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue?post=3268"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_categories?post=3268"},{"taxonomy":"issuem_issue_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/weekly.uhm.org.mt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issuem_issue_tags?post=3268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}